Award of Escravos Contract: We followed due process

The attention of the Management of the Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA) has been drawn to allegations of fraud being made against it by companies that lost out in their bid to secure the contract of the dredging of Escravos Bar in Warri.

The Authority has maintained a dignified silence on the allegations until now as a result of the confidence that all processes as enumerated in the Public Procurement Act (PPA), 2004 were followed in the award of this contract and that if indeed, the said entity had any valid grounds for protests, the law courts, rather than newspapers, where they have continued to peddle lies against the Authority, would be their recourse.

MD, Nigerian Ports Authority

However, after due consideration of our obligations to be accountable to the people of Nigeria that we serve, the Authority has decided to provide the following information in response to the spurious allegations and campaign of calumny being spread in the media.

    1. The first point to make is that the Authority is guided by provisions of the Procurement Act in all its procurement processes and that not in the Warri contract or any other contract for that matter, have we gone against the provisions of the Law.
    2. In addition to that, all procurements by the Authority is subject to the supervision/approval of the Bureau of Public Procurement(BPP) and the Authority received the necessary approvals before going ahead with the award of the contract for the dredging Warri Channel.
    3. All arithmetic computations so done by the Authority are in line with the PPA which so permits for the procuring entity to do such and consequent documentations of the computations were submitted to BPP for no objection which was obliged.
    4. The Authority, upon receipt of the petition alleging that Dredging International Nigeria Limited had been convicted by a law court in Switzerland, sought the legal counsel of the Office of the Attorney General of the Federation and requested an investigation of the petition by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).
    5. In addition to this, although Dredging International Nigeria Limited provided us with a sworn affidavit in support of claims that they were different from the company that was so convicted, the Authority engaged a legal practitioner who embarked on an independent investigation of the petition and the claims of the company.
    6. These investigation revealed that allegations that Messers Dredging International Services Nigeria Limited had been convicted in a law court in Switzerland for corrupt practices involving some officials of the Nigerian government including the NPA were incorrect. The Company so convicted in the Swiss Court is Dredging Cyprus Ltd which is a co-subsidiary of DISN. The two companies have different legal personalities as so recognized by the provisions of the Companies and Allied Matters Act (CAMA), 2004. The conviction of a subsidiary company indeed is not the conviction of all companies within a group of companies. In addition, none of the directors so convicted for complicity by the court in Switzerland is on the board of Dredging International Nigeria Limited. The result of these investigations were made available to the BPP.
    7. Nevertheless, the BPP itself set up an independent investigation of the petition and came to the conclusion that the company was eligible to participate in the bidding process.
    8. There have also been allegations of conflict of interest coming from the fact the Managing Director of the NPA alongside some of the Directors are on the board of Bonny Channel Company (BCC), a joint venture set up as a long term structure for the continuous management, maintenance and provision of navigational aids of the Bonny channel with some Directors of the awardee. But these directors are on the board of the BBC on the strength of their current appointment. The NPA is chair of this JV by virtue of its ownership of 60 percent shareholding in the Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) and our directors do not have any private interests in the Company.
    9. It is regrettable that the company that has continued to promote this extensive blackmail of the NPA is part of the consortium whose contract was terminated for having claimed to execute works of $34.6mill in the Calabar Channel out of which $12.5mill has been paid without evidence of work done. The Nigerian Government is currently in court with this consortium seeking for the refund of the Authority’s $12.5mill for work claimed to have been done without evidence.
    10. The Management of the Nigerian Ports Authority therefore urges the good people of Nigeria to disregard this attempt to drag it in the mud by an organisation, which is surely still dazed by our audacity to terminate the Calabar Channel contract and take them to court for the refund of monies collected.
    11. The Authority reiterate its commitment to transparent operations for the ultimate benefit of the Nigerian economy and thank all Nigerians for their support.

Isah Suwaid
For: Management

Translate »

[ninja_form id=5]